引用本文: | 李幼凤, 苏宏业, 褚健.工业过程的子空间模型辨识[J].控制理论与应用,2007,24(5):803~806.[点击复制] |
LI You-feng, SU Hong-ye, CHU Jian.Subspace model identification for industrial processes[J].Control Theory and Technology,2007,24(5):803~806.[点击复制] |
|
工业过程的子空间模型辨识 |
Subspace model identification for industrial processes |
摘要点击 3424 全文点击 2270 投稿时间:2006-03-11 修订日期:2006-07-04 |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
DOI编号 10.7641/j.issn.1000-8152.2007.5.021 |
2007,24(5):803-806 |
中文关键词 子空间 系统辨识 预测误差方法 模型预测控制 |
英文关键词 subspace system identification predictive error method (PEM) model predictive control (MPC) |
基金项目 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60421002); 浙江省新世纪151人才工程重点资助项目. |
|
中文摘要 |
子空间模型辨识方法(SMI) 是一类新兴的直接估计线性状态空间模型的黑箱建模方法, 近年来获得了广泛关注. 和传统的线性建模方法相比, SMI的优势不仅在于算法本身的简单可靠, 也在于它的状态空间表达. 本文首先简要介绍了SMI 的基本思想以及3种基本算法(N4SID, MOESP, CVA). 然后将这类方法应用于一个实际的工业过程建模, 同时对3种SMI 基本算法和一种传统辨识算法—预测误差方法(PEM) 进行了研究对比. |
英文摘要 |
Subspace model identification (SMI) methods, a new class of black-box algorithms to setting up a linear state space model directly from input-output data, have drawn much research attention recently. Compared with the classical linear system identification methods, SMI methods are attractive not only because of their numerical simplicity and stability, but also their availabilities for the state space form. In this paper, the basic idea of SMI methods and three basic algorithms, i.e., N4SID, MOESP and CVA, are briefly addressed at first. Then comparison between the SMI methods and the classical system identification method-PEM (prediction error methods) is made based on the same data sets collected from a real industrial process. |
|
|
|
|
|