| 引用本文: | 包甜甜,谢新连,魏照坤.新的证据冲突度量方法[J].控制理论与应用,2017,34(1):41~48.[点击复制] |
| Bao Tian-tian,XIE Xin-lian,Wei Zhao-kun.Novel approach for measuring the conflict between evidence[J].Control Theory and Technology,2017,34(1):41~48.[点击复制] |
|
| 新的证据冲突度量方法 |
| Novel approach for measuring the conflict between evidence |
| 摘要点击 2665 全文点击 1376 投稿时间：2016-05-03 修订日期：2016-09-14 |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| DOI编号 10.7641/CTA.2017.60275 |
| 2017,34(1):41-48 |
| 中文关键词 不确定性 证据理论 冲突证据 证据距离 熵 |
| 英文关键词 uncertainty evidence theory conflicting evidence distance between evidence entropy |
| 基金项目 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3132016358), 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20102125110002)资助. |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 为了解决证据理论在处理高度冲突证据时会出现的失效问题, 研究了证据冲突的度量和表示方法. 首先,
证据距离作为一种主要的证据冲突度量方法, 通过分析各种证据距离的不足, 定义一种新的概率距离, 并结合
Jousselme距离来描述证据之间的差异性. 其次, 由于证据距离无法完全代表证据冲突, 根据模糊交叉熵的概念, 定
义了基本概率指派(basic probability assignment, BPA)交叉熵来表示证据之间的散度. 再次, 通过Hamacher T–余范融
合证据距离和证据散度两个方面, 提出一种新的证据冲突度量方法. 最后用数值算例验证了该方法的有效性. |
| 英文摘要 |
| To solve the invalidation problems when the evidence theory is used to deal with the cases with highly
conflicting evidence, a new method is investigated for measuring and representing the degree of conflict between evidence.
First of all, based on the comparison and analysis of some existing evidence distance methods which are the main conflict
measures, a new probabilistic-based distance is defined and combined with Jousselme’s distance to describe the difference
between evidence. Next, because the conception of evidence distance cannot substitute for the definition of evidential
conflict completely, a cross entropy of basic probability assignments (BPAs) is proposed based on the idea of fuzzy cross
entropy to present the degree of divergence between evidence. Then, in the light of mixing the distance and divergence
between evidence by applying Hamacher T-conorm, a new method for measuring the degree of conflict between evidence
is put forward. Finally, the numerical examples verify the efficiency of the proposed method. |
|
|
|
|
|