引用本文:唐德翠,高志强,张绪红.浊度大时滞过程的预测自抗扰控制器设计[J].控制理论与应用,2017,34(1):101~108.[点击复制]
TANG De-cui,GAO Zhi-qiang,ZHANG Xu-hong.Design of predictive active disturbance rejection controller for turbidity[J].Control Theory and Technology,2017,34(1):101~108.[点击复制]
浊度大时滞过程的预测自抗扰控制器设计
Design of predictive active disturbance rejection controller for turbidity
摘要点击 2753  全文点击 2441  投稿时间:2016-05-09  修订日期:2016-09-25
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
DOI编号  10.7641/CTA.2017.60300
  2017,34(1):101-108
中文关键词  浊度过程  大时滞  自抗扰控制  Smith预估  参数整定
英文关键词  turbidity process  large time-delay  active disturbance rejection control  Smith predictor  parameter tuning
基金项目  广东省自然科学基金项目(S2013010015007), 广东省公益研究与能力建设项目(2015A010104010)资助.
作者单位E-mail
唐德翠 广东技术师范学院 gstangdecui@163.com 
高志强* 美国克利夫兰州立大学  
张绪红 美国克利夫兰州立大学  
中文摘要
      待滤水浊度过程涉及复杂的物理、化学反应, 具有明显的大时滞、不确定性和干扰多等特点, 一直是制水 行业公认的难控系统. 针对其干扰多和不确定性特点, 采用自抗扰控制来主动实时估计扰动并进行补偿; 针对其大 时滞特点, 采用预测控制对输出提前预报来弥补大时滞系统中的信息不及时, 从而得到一种既具信息预估又具主动 补偿总扰动的预测自抗扰控制器. 本文重点分析了预测自抗扰控制器的性能, 给出了时滞系统在该控制器作用下 的开环频率参数求取方法及简单实用的参数整定公式, 最后将其与几种常见控制器进行了仿真比较. 仿真结果表 明: 预测自抗扰控制器具有良好的抗扰恢复能力和设定值跟踪能力, 且参数整定容易, 具有简单、好用且有效等特 点, 为该控制器的工业化应用提供了积极的指导作用.
英文摘要
      Turbidity process, which involves complex physical and chemical reactions, is difficult to control for engineers due to its characteristics of large time-delay, uncertainties and disturbances. For this reason, a novel predictive active disturbance rejection control (PADRC) strategy is proposed, which owns the advantages of predictive control and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC). The ADRC part aims to estimate the total disturbances, and cancel from the control output to deal with the uncertainties; the predictor part is adopted to predict the output to compensate the lack of data resulted from large time delay. The performance of PADRC has been analyzed in detail. In addition, a general method to solve the open-loop frequency parameters is provided, as well as the parameter tuning equations. Finally, simulation-based comparisons of PADRC and three regular control approaches has been made. The results show that PADRC has a better performance, especially in set point tracking and disturbances rejecting. Moreover, PADRC is simple, practical and easy to tune parameters, thus providing guidelines for industrial applications of similar systems.